<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eBay&#8217;s Social Media-Hijacking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cgmtrends.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/ebays-social-media-hijacking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cgmtrends.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/ebays-social-media-hijacking/</link>
	<description>Staying ahead of the networked market game</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 07:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mydogssmarter</title>
		<link>http://cgmtrends.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/ebays-social-media-hijacking/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>mydogssmarter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 04:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cgmtrends.wordpress.com/?p=140#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Interesting that you call the boycott unsuccessful even though it is really too early to tell what the actual repercussions will be. If the organizers really wanted to bring ebaY down, it probably could have been done. 

Many are not actually saying they have joined the boycott due to the reasons you list, like banning all those who joined, getting rid of posts/discussion that are in favor, etc etc...what you fail to realize is most sellers only wanted ebaY to see the error of their ways, especially when it came to not allowing the seller to leave negative feedback on a buyer who really needed it. The changes will be reversed after those who pushed for it see the damage it has wrought.

Finally, a lower stock price will drive ebaY management to reverse the bad policy in favor of the old system because common sense will dictate this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that you call the boycott unsuccessful even though it is really too early to tell what the actual repercussions will be. If the organizers really wanted to bring ebaY down, it probably could have been done. </p>
<p>Many are not actually saying they have joined the boycott due to the reasons you list, like banning all those who joined, getting rid of posts/discussion that are in favor, etc etc&#8230;what you fail to realize is most sellers only wanted ebaY to see the error of their ways, especially when it came to not allowing the seller to leave negative feedback on a buyer who really needed it. The changes will be reversed after those who pushed for it see the damage it has wrought.</p>
<p>Finally, a lower stock price will drive ebaY management to reverse the bad policy in favor of the old system because common sense will dictate this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
